| 2012 GA DNR Lidar DEM: Floyd, Paulding, Oconee, and Polk Counties | identificationInfo|
|---|---|
| (MI_Metadata) fileIdentifier: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:58141 language: LanguageCode: eng characterSet: (MD_CharacterSetCode) UTF8 hierarchyLevel: (MD_ScopeCode) dataset contact: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: OCM Partners contactInfo: (CI_Contact) phone: (CI_Telephone) voice: (missing) address: (CI_Address) role: (CI_RoleCode) resourceProvider contact: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: NOAA Office for Coastal Management contactInfo: (CI_Contact) phone: (CI_Telephone) voice: (843) 740-1202 address: (CI_Address) deliveryPoint: 2234 South Hobson Ave city: Charleston administrativeArea: SC postalCode: 29405-2413 country: (missing) electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.gov onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Website description: NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) information role: (CI_RoleCode) pointOfContact dateStamp: DateTime: 2019-11-04T07:39:06 metadataStandardName: ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata Part 2 Extensions for imagery and gridded data metadataStandardVersion: ISO 19115-2:2009(E) return to top identificationInfo: (MD_DataIdentification) citation: (CI_Citation) title: 2012 GA DNR Lidar DEM: Floyd, Paulding, Oconee, and Polk Counties alternateTitle: 2012 Floyd Paulding Oconee Polk m8919 date: (CI_Date) date: 2012 dateType: (CI_DateTypeCode) creation date: (CI_Date) date: 2012-09-23 dateType: (CI_DateTypeCode) publication identifier: (MD_Identifier) authority: (CI_Citation) title: NOAA/NMFS/EDM date: (inapplicable) code: Anchor: InPort Catalog ID 58141 citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: (inapplicable) contactInfo: (CI_Contact) onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Data Access Viewer description: Application to provide custom processing of datasets. function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) download role: (inapplicable) citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: (inapplicable) contactInfo: (CI_Contact) onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/lidar1_z/geoid12a/data/1420/breaklines/GA_Flyod_Paulding_Oconee.zip protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Breaklines description: Breaklines for the counties in GDB format. Breaklines have not been evaluated by NOAA. function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) download role: (inapplicable) citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: (inapplicable) contactInfo: (CI_Contact) onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/lidar1_z/geoid12a/data/1420/supplemental/2012_gadnr_lidar_Acquisition_Report.pdf protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Acquistion Report description: Report from the lidar contractor. function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) download role: (inapplicable) presentationForm: (unknown) abstract: The PSFY12 GADNR Elevation Data Task Order involves: collecting and delivering topographic elevation point data derived from multiple return light detection and ranging (LiDAR) measurements for portions of 4 counties in Georgia. The Statement of Work (SOW) was developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Office for Coastal Management (referred to as the Center) in partnership with the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (GADNR) Environmental Protection Division (EPD). The counties included Floyd, Polk, Paulding and Oconee. The purpose of the data is for use in coastal management decision making, including applications such as flood plain mapping and water rights management. LiDAR was collected at 1.0 points per square meter (1.0m GSD) for the portions of Floyd, Polk, Paulding and Oconee Counties. This area was flown during snow free and leaf-off conditions. TASK NAME:FY 2012 GEORGIA DNR ELEVATION DATA NOAA Contract No. EA133C11CQ0010 Requisition No. NCNP0000-11-02615 Woolpert Order No. 71511 CONTRACTOR: Woolpert, Inc. purpose: This task order consisted of LiDAR data acquisition and processing for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Office for Coastal Management (OCM) four Counties in Georgia: Floyd, Oconee, Paulding and Polk. The LiDAR data acquisition and processing for Floyd, Oconee, Paulding and Polk Counties was performed in the Spring of 2012. The LiDAR data was provided to NOAA OCM, as part of the FY 2012 Georgia Elevation Data task order. The task order area for Floyd, Polk, and Paulding Counties was approximately 460.6 square miles, and the task order area for Oconee County was approximately 233.6 square miles The LiDAR data was collected to meet Fundamental Vertical Accuracy (FVA) Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 18.0 cm or better at a 95% confidence level, so that when combined with breaklines, the data adequately supports the generation of two (2) foot FEMA compliant contours. The final LiDAR data was delivered in 5,000' x 5,000' tiles using NAD 1983 (NSRS2007), Georgia State Plane Coordinate System, West Zone 1002. status: (MD_ProgressCode) completed pointOfContact: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: NOAA Office for Coastal Management contactInfo: (CI_Contact) phone: (CI_Telephone) voice: (843) 740-1202 address: (CI_Address) deliveryPoint: 2234 South Hobson Ave city: Charleston administrativeArea: SC postalCode: 29405-2413 country: (missing) electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.gov onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Website description: NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) information role: (CI_RoleCode) pointOfContact pointOfContact: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: NOAA Office for Coastal Management contactInfo: (CI_Contact) phone: (CI_Telephone) voice: (843) 740-1202 address: (CI_Address) deliveryPoint: 2234 South Hobson Ave city: Charleston administrativeArea: SC postalCode: 29405-2413 country: (missing) electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.gov onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Website description: NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) information role: (CI_RoleCode) custodian resourceMaintenance: (MD_MaintenanceInformation) maintenanceAndUpdateFrequency: (MD_MaintenanceFrequencyCode) asNeeded graphicOverview: (MD_BrowseGraphic) fileName: https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/lidar1_z/geoid12a/data/1420/supplemental/2012_NOAA_Georgia_LiDAR_Footprints.kmz fileDescription: This graphic shows the lidar coverage for Polk County, Paulding County, Floyd County and Oconee County in Georgia. fileType: kmz descriptiveKeywords: (MD_Keywords) keyword: DEM keyword: Digital Elevaton Model keyword: Elevation keyword: LAS keyword: Lidar keyword: Topography type: (MD_KeywordTypeCode) theme descriptiveKeywords: (MD_Keywords) keyword: Georgia keyword: Oconee County keyword: Paulding County keyword: Polk County keyword: United States type: (MD_KeywordTypeCode) place descriptiveKeywords: (MD_Keywords) keyword: DEMs - partner (no harvest) type: (MD_KeywordTypeCode) project thesaurusName: (CI_Citation) title: InPort date: (inapplicable) resourceConstraints: (MD_Constraints) useLimitation: NOAA provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incomplete, incorrect, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of the data. It is the responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data is suitable for the intended purpose. resourceConstraints: (MD_LegalConstraints) accessConstraints: (MD_RestrictionCode) otherRestrictions useConstraints: (MD_RestrictionCode) otherRestrictions otherConstraints: Access Constraints: None | Use Constraints: Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. These data depict the heights at the time of the survey and are only accurate for that time. | Distribution Liability: Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of Woolpert, NOAA, GADNR, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners. resourceConstraints: (MD_SecurityConstraints) classification: (MD_ClassificationCode) unclassified classificationSystem: Unclassified handlingDescription: Unclassified aggregationInfo: (MD_AggregateInformation) aggregateDataSetName: (CI_Citation) title: 2012 Georgia Department of Natural Resources (GADNR) Topographic LiDAR: Floyd, Polk, Paulding and Oconee Counties date: (unknown) identifier: (MD_Identifier) authority: (CI_Citation) title: NOAA/NMFS/EDM date: (inapplicable) code: 49604 associationType: (DS_AssociationTypeCode) crossReference spatialRepresentationType: (MD_SpatialRepresentationTypeCode) grid spatialResolution: (MD_Resolution) distance: Distance: 4 language: eng; US topicCategory: (MD_TopicCategoryCode) elevation extent: (EX_Extent) geographicElement: (EX_GeographicBoundingBox) westBoundLongitude: -85.26314 eastBoundLongitude: -83.249536 southBoundLatitude: 33.681195 northBoundLatitude: 34.367865 temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimeInstant: description: | Currentness: Ground Condition timePosition: 2012-03-06 temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimeInstant: description: | Currentness: Ground Condition timePosition: 2012-03-19 temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimeInstant: description: | Currentness: Ground Condition timePosition: 2012-03-20 temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimeInstant: description: | Currentness: Ground Condition timePosition: 2012-03-25 temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimeInstant: description: | Currentness: Ground Condition timePosition: 2012-03-26 supplementalInformation: The reflective surface data represents the DEM created by the laser energy reflected from the first surface encountered by the laser pulse. Some energy may continue beyond this initial surface, to be reflected by a subsequent surface as represented by the last return data. Intensity information is captured from the reflective surface pulse and indicates the relative energy returned to the sensor, as compared to the energy transmitted. The intensity image is not calibrated or normalized but indicates differences in energy absorption due to the interaction of the surface materials with laser energy, at the wavelength transmitted by the sensor. The bare earth model is created by identifying the returns that fall on the ground surface and by interpolating a surface between these points. In this manner, buildings and vegetation are removed from the bare earth model. This data set does not include bridges and overpasses in the bare earth model as the delineation point for these structures is not reliably discernable in the LiDAR data. The third-party QA report for this data set may be accessed at: https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/lidar1_z/geoid12a/data/1420/supplemental/2012_gadnr_lidar_Acquisition_Report.pdf A footprint of this data set may be viewed in Google Earth at: https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/lidar1_z/geoid12a/data/1420/supplemental/2012_NOAA_Georgia_LiDAR_Footprints.kmz return to top contentInfo: (MD_FeatureCatalogueDescription) complianceCode: false language: LanguageCode: eng includedWithDataset: false featureCatalogueCitation: (CI_Citation) title: none date: (unavailable) return to top distributionInfo: (MD_Distribution) distributionFormat: (MD_Format) name: Zip version: (missing) distributionFormat: (MD_Format) name: GeoTIFF version: (missing) distributor: (MD_Distributor) distributorContact: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: NOAA Office for Coastal Management contactInfo: (CI_Contact) phone: (CI_Telephone) voice: (843) 740-1202 address: (CI_Address) deliveryPoint: 2234 South Hobson Ave city: Charleston administrativeArea: SC postalCode: 29405-2413 country: (missing) electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.gov onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Website description: NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) information role: (CI_RoleCode) distributor transferOptions: (MD_DigitalTransferOptions) onLine: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=8919 protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Customized Download description: Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc. function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) download transferOptions: (MD_DigitalTransferOptions) onLine: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/raster2/elevation/GA_Floyd_Polk_Paulding_Oconee_2012_8919 protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Bulk Download description: Simple download of data files. function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) download return to top dataQualityInfo: (DQ_DataQuality) scope: (DQ_Scope) level: (MD_ScopeCode) dataset report: (DQ_QuantitativeAttributeAccuracy) nameOfMeasure: Accuracy evaluationMethodDescription: The LiDAR collected for this task order was collected to meet a Fundamental Vertical Accuracy (FVA) of NSSDA RMSEZ = 18cm (NSSDA AccuracyZ 95% = 30cm) or better; assessment procedures to comply with FEMA, NSSDA, NDEP, and ASPRS guidelines. result: (missing) report: (DQ_AbsoluteExternalPositionalAccuracy) nameOfMeasure: Horizontal Positional Accuracy evaluationMethodDescription: Horizontal accuracy is +/- 4 foot at the 95% confidence level using RMSE(r) x 1.7308 when compared to the classified lidar, as defined by the FGDC Geospatial Positional Accuracy Standards, Part 3: NSSDA. LiDAR system calibration is available in the project report. result: (missing) report: (DQ_AbsoluteExternalPositionalAccuracy) nameOfMeasure: Vertical Positional Accuracy evaluationMethodDescription: The LiDAR data vertical accuracy RMSE is 5.7 cm (0.188 ft) when compared to the classified lidar. The data collected under this Task Order meets the FEMA, NSSDA, NDEP, and ASPRS guidelines for accuracy standards. These standards specify that vertical accuracy be reported at the 95 percent confidence level for data tested by an independent source of higher accuracy. (http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/accuracy/part3/index_html). 46 survey control points were used for lidar processing The Fundamental Vertical Accuracy (FVA) of the TIN: 11.2 cm (0.368 ft) at a 95% confidence level, derived according to NSSDA. Forty-Six (46) control points were were surveyed by Woolpert survey crews and used for the lidar processing and accuracy reporting. The control points and their coordinates can be found in section 6 of the lidar processing report. Vertical Accuracy Statistics Floyd, Polk and Paulding Counties, Georgia: Tested 0.399 feet fundamental vertical accuracy at 95 percent confidence level when compared to the classified lidar in open terrain using RMSE(z) x 1.9600. Vertical Accuracy Statistics Oconee County, Georgia: Tested 0.352 feet fundamental vertical accuracy at 95 percent confidence level when compared to the classified lidar in open terrain using RMSE(z) x 1.9600 OVERALL Vertical Accuracy Statistics Floyd, Polk, Paulding and Oconee Counties, Georgia: Tested 0.368 feet fundamental vertical accuracy at 95 percent confidence level when compared to the classified lidar in open terrainusing RMSE(z) x 1.9600. result: (missing) report: (DQ_CompletenessCommission) nameOfMeasure: Completeness Report evaluationMethodDescription: The LiDAR data is visually inspected for completeness to ensure that are no gaps between flight lines. result: (missing) report: (DQ_ConceptualConsistency) nameOfMeasure: Conceptual Consistency evaluationMethodDescription: All formatted data are validated using commercial GIS software to ensure proper formatting and loading prior to delivery. result: (missing) lineage: (LI_Lineage) statement: Data were collected and processed by Woolpert for Georgia DNR through a NOAA contract vehicle. Data are made available through the NOAA Digital Coast. processStep: (LI_ProcessStep) description: Using a Leica LiDAR system, 84 flight lines of high density data, at a nominal pulse spacing (NPS) of 1.0 meter, were collected over Floyd, Oconee, Paulding and Polk Counties, GA (approximately 694.2 square miles). Multiple returns were recorded for each laser pulse along with an intensity value for each return. A total of five (5) missions were flown on March 6, 19, 20, 25 and 26 in 2012. The geoid used to reduce satellite derived elevations to orthometric heights was Geoid09. The horizontal datum used for this survey is NAD 1983 NSRS2007, Georgia State Plane Coordinate System, West Zone 1002, and expressed in US Survey Feet. The vertical datum used for this survey is North American Vertical Datum 1988 (NAVD88), and expressed in US Survey Feet. Airborne GPS data was differentially processed and integrated with the post processed IMU data to derive a smoothed best estimate of trajectory (SBET). The SBET was used to reduce the LiDAR slant range measurements to a raw reflective surface for each flight line. The aerial LiDAR was collected at the following sensor specifications for the Oconee County Project: Post Spacing (Minimum): 3.28 ft / 1.0 m AGL (Above Ground Level) average flying height: 6,500 ft / 1,981 m MSL (Mean Sea Level) average flying height: 6,940 ft / 2,115 m Average Ground Speed: 130 knots / 149 mph Field of View (full): 40 degrees Pulse Rate: 115.6 kHz Sensor Scan Rate: 41.8 Hz Side Lap (Minimum): 25% Flight Lines Flown at these specifications: 1 - 27 (All) The aerial LiDAR was collected at two different sensor specifications for the Floyd, Polk, and Paulding Counties Project: Those LIDAR flight lines that entered the Atlanta Class B Airspace restriction area were flown at a lower altitude specification in order to maintain an altitude of 6500 feet MSL. These instructions were mandated by Atlanta Tracon. Post Spacing (Minimum): 3.28 ft / 1.0 m AGL (Above Ground Level) average flying height: 6,500 ft / 1,981 m MSL (Mean Sea Level) average flying height: 7,075 ft / 2,156 m Average Ground Speed: 130 knots / 149 mph Field of View (full): 40 degrees Pulse Rate: 115.6 kHz Sensor Scan Rate: 41.8 Hz Side Lap (Minimum): 25% Flight Lines Flown at these specifications: 1 - 20 Post Spacing (Minimum): 3.28 ft / 1.0 m AGL (Above Ground Level) average flying height: 5,925 ft / 1,825 m MSL (Mean Sea Level) average flying height: 6,500 ft / 1,981 m Average Ground Speed: 130 knots / 149 mph Field of View (full): 44 degrees Pulse Rate: 124.0 kHz Sensor Scan Rate: 43.1 Hz Side Lap (Minimum): 25% Flight Lines Flown at these specifications 21 - 57 dateTime: DateTime: 2012-03-06T00:00:00 processStep: (LI_ProcessStep) description: The Leica ALS50/60 LiDAR systems calibration and performance is verified on a periodic basis using Woolpert's calibration range. The calibration range consists of a large building and runway. The edges of the building and control points along the runway have been located using conventional survey methods. Inertial measurement unit (IMU) misalignment angles and horizontal accuracy are calculated by comparing the position of the building edges between opposing flight lines. The scanner scale factor and vertical accuracy is calculated through comparison of LiDAR data against control points along the runway. Field calibration is performed on all flight lines to refine the IMU misalignment angles. IMU misalignment angles are calculated from the relative displacement of features within the overlap region of adjacent (and opposing) flight lines. The raw LiDAR data is reduced using the refined misalignment angles. dateTime: DateTime: 2011-12-13T00:00:00 processStep: (LI_ProcessStep) description: Once the data acquisition and GPS processing phases are complete, the LiDAR data was processed immediately to verify the coverage had no voids. The GPS and IMU data was post processed using differential and Kalman filter algorithms to derive a best estimate of trajectory. The quality of the solution was verified to be consistent with the accuracy requirements of the task order. dateTime: DateTime: 2012-03-26T00:00:00 processStep: (LI_ProcessStep) description: The individual flight lines were inspected to ensure the systematic and residual errors have been identified and removed. Then, the flight lines were compared to adjacent flight lines for any mismatches to obtain a homogenous coverage throughout the project area. The point cloud underwent a classification process to determine bare-earth points and non-ground points utilizing "first and only" as well as "last of many" LiDAR returns. This process determined bare-earth points (Class 2), noise (Class 7), water (Class 9) ignored ground (Class 10), unclassified data (Class 1), and overlap points (Class 12). The bare-earth (Class 2 - Ground) LiDAR points underwent a manual QA/QC step to verify that artifacts have been removed from the bare-earth surface. The surveyed ground control points are used to perform the accuracy checks and statistical analysis of the LiDAR dataset. dateTime: DateTime: 2012-09-01T00:00:00 processStep: (LI_ProcessStep) description: The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) received topographic DEM files in ERDAS Imagine format. The files were converted to GeoTiff format for distribution in the Digital Coast Data Access Viewer and to conform to the Open Data Policy. Georeferencing was added to indicate the vertical reference system was NAVD88 in survey feet. The geoid model of GEOID09 was not changed. dateTime: DateTime: 2019-11-04T00:00:00 processor: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: NOAA Office for Coastal Management contactInfo: (CI_Contact) phone: (CI_Telephone) voice: (843) 740-1202 address: (CI_Address) electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.gov role: (CI_RoleCode) processor source: (LI_Source) description: Source Contribution: The LiDAR data collected for this task order. | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: disc sourceCitation: (CI_Citation) title: FY 2012 GEORGIA DNR ELEVATION DATA date: (CI_Date) date: 2012-09-23 dateType: (CI_DateTypeCode) publication citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: Woolpert, Inc. role: (inapplicable) sourceExtent: (EX_Extent) temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimeInstant: timePosition: 2012-03-06 | |